Citations
Official citations of Judgments, Advisory Opinions and Orders
Case - Affaire | Name of case (in bold) and official citation of Judgments/Orders Nom de l’affaire (en caractères gras) et mode officiel de citation des arrêts/ordonnances |
---|---|
1 | The M/V “SAIGA” Case (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea), Prompt Release |
M/V “SAIGA” (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea), Order of 13 November 1997, ITLOS Reports 1997, p. 4 | |
M/V “SAIGA” (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea), Order of 21 November 1997, ITLOS Reports 1997, p. 10 | |
M/V “SAIGA” (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea), Prompt Release, Judgment, ITLOS Reports 1997, p. 16 | |
2 | The M/V “SAIGA” (No. 2) Case (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea) |
M/V “SAIGA” (No. 2) (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea), Order of 20 January 1998, ITLOS Reports 1998, p. 4 | |
M/V “SAIGA” (No. 2) (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea), Order of 20 February 1998, ITLOS Reports 1998, p. 10 | |
M/V “SAIGA” (No. 2) (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea), Order of 23 February 1998, ITLOS Reports 1998, p. 18 | |
M/V “SAIGA” (No. 2) (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea), Provisional Measures, Order of 11 March 1998, ITLOS Reports 1998, p. 24 | |
M/V “SAIGA” (No. 2) (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea), Order of 16 September 1998, ITLOS Reports 1998, p. 72 | |
M/V “SAIGA” (No. 2) (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea), Order of 6 October 1998, ITLOS Reports 1998, p. 78 | |
M/V “SAIGA” (No. 2) (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea), Order of 18 January 1999, ITLOS Reports 1999, p. 4 | |
M/V “SAIGA” (No. 2) (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea), Judgment, ITLOS Reports 1999, p. 10 | |
3 and 4 | Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases (New Zealand v. Japan; Australia v. Japan), Provisional Measures |
Southern Bluefin Tuna (New Zealand v. Japan), Order of 3 August 1999, ITLOS Reports 1999, p. 262 | |
Southern Bluefin Tuna (Australia v. Japan), Order of 3 August 1999, ITLOS Reports 1999, p. 268 | |
Southern Bluefin Tuna (New Zealand v. Japan; Australia v. Japan), Order of 16 August 1999, ITLOS Reports 1999, p. 274 | |
Southern Bluefin Tuna (New Zealand v. Japan; Australia v. Japan), Provisional Measures, Order of 27 August 1999, ITLOS Reports 1999, p. 280 | |
5 | The “Camouco” Case (Panama v. France), Prompt Release |
“Camouco” (Panama v. France), Order of 17 January 2000, ITLOS Reports 2000, p. 4 | |
“Camouco” (Panama v. France), Prompt Release, Judgment, ITLOS Reports 2000, p. 10 | |
6 | The “Monte Confurco” Case (Seychelles v. France), Prompt Release |
“Monte Confurco” (Seychelles v. France), Order of 27 November 2000, ITLOS Reports 2000, p. 80 | |
“Monte Confurco” (Seychelles v. France), Prompt Release, Judgment, ITLOS Reports 2000, p. 86 | |
7 | Case concerning the Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean (Chile/European Union) |
Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks (Chile/European Community), Order of 20 December 2000, ITLOS Reports 2000, p. 148 | |
Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks (Chile/European Community), Order of 15 March 2001, ITLOS Reports 2001, p. 4 | |
Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks (Chile/European Community), Order of 16 December 2003, ITLOS Reports 2003, p. 69 | |
Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks (Chile/European Community), Order of 29 December 2005, ITLOS Reports 2005-2007, p. 4 | |
Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks (Chile/European Community), Order of 30 November 2007, ITLOS Reports 2005-2007, p. 128 | |
Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks (Chile/European Community), Order of 11 December 2008, ITLOS Reports 2008-2010, p. 4 | |
Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks (Chile/European Union), Order of 16 December 2009, ITLOS Reports 2008-2010, p. 13 | |
8 | The “Grand Prince” Case (Belize v. France), Prompt Release |
“Grand Prince” (Belize v. France), Order of 21 March 2001, ITLOS Reports 2001, p. 11 | |
“Grand Prince” (Belize v. France), Prompt Release, Judgment, ITLOS Reports 2001, p. 17 | |
9 | The “Chaisiri Reefer 2” Case (Panama v. Yemen), Prompt Release |
“Chaisiri Reefer 2” (Panama v. Yemen), Order of 6 July 2001, ITLOS Reports 2001, p. 76 | |
“Chaisiri Reefer 2” (Panama v. Yemen), Order of 13 July 2001, ITLOS Reports 2001, p. 82 | |
10 | The MOX Plant Case (Ireland v. United Kingdom), Provisional Measures |
MOX Plant (Ireland v. United Kingdom), Order of 13 November 2001, ITLOS Reports 2001, p. 89 | |
MOX Plant (Ireland v. United Kingdom), Provisional Measures, Order of 3 December 2001, ITLOS Reports 2001, p. 95 | |
11 | The “Volga” Case (Russian Federation v. Australia), Prompt Release |
“Volga” (Russian Federation v. Australia), Order of 2 December 2002, ITLOS Reports 2002, p. 4 | |
“Volga” (Russian Federation v. Australia), Prompt Release, Judgment, ITLOS Reports 2002, p. 10 | |
12 | Case concerning Land Reclamation by Singapore in and around the Straits of Johor (Malaysia v. Singapore), Provisional Measures |
Land Reclamation in and around the Straits of Johor (Malaysia v. Singapore),Order of 10 September 2003, ITLOS Reports 2003, p. 4 | |
Land Reclamation in and around the Straits of Johor (Malaysia v. Singapore), Provisional Measures, Order of 8 October 2003, ITLOS Reports 2003, p. 10 | |
13 | The “Juno Trader” Case (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea-Bissau), Prompt Release |
“Juno Trader” (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea-Bissau), Order of 19 November 2004, ITLOS Reports 2004, p. 4 | |
“Juno Trader” (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea-Bissau), Order of 1 December 2004, ITLOS Reports 2004, p. 10 | |
“Juno Trader” (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea-Bissau), Prompt Release, Judgment, ITLOS Reports 2004, p. 17 | |
14 | The “Hoshinmaru” Case (Japan v. Russian Federation), Prompt Release |
“Hoshinmaru” (Japan v. Russian Federation), Order of 9 July 2007, ITLOS Reports 2005-2007, p. 12 | |
“Hoshinmaru” (Japan v. Russian Federation), Prompt Release, Judgment, ITLOS Reports 2005-2007, p. 18 | |
15 | The “Tomimaru” Case (Japan v. Russian Federation), Prompt Release |
“Tomimaru” (Japan v. Russian Federation), Order of 9 July 2007, ITLOS Reports 2005-2007, p. 68 | |
“Tomimaru” (Japan v. Russian Federation), Prompt Release, Judgment, ITLOS Reports 2005-2007, p. 74 | |
16 | Dispute concerning delimitation of the maritime boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh/Myanmar) |
Delimitation of the maritime boundary in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh/Myanmar), Order of 28 January 2010, ITLOS Reports 2008-2010, p. 24 | |
Delimitation of the maritime boundary in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh/Myanmar), Order of 17 March 2010, ITLOS Reports 2008-2010, p. 32 | |
Delimitation of the maritime boundary in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh/Myanmar), Order of 19 August 2011, ITLOS Reports 2011, p. 4 | |
Delimitation of the maritime boundary in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh/Myanmar), Judgment, ITLOS Reports 2012, p. 4 | |
17 | Responsibilities and obligations of States sponsoring persons and entities with respect to activities in the Area (Request for Advisory Opinion submitted to the Seabed Disputes Chamber) |
Responsibilities and obligations of States with respect to activities in the Area, Order of 18 May 2010, ITLOS Reports 2008-2010, p. 39 | |
Responsibilities and obligations of States with respect to activities in the Area, Order of 28 July 2010, ITLOS Reports 2008-2010, p. 46 | |
Responsibilities and obligations of States with respect to activities in the Area, Advisory Opinion, 1 February 2011, ITLOS Reports 2011, p. 10 | |
* Initally, the case was named Responsibilities and obligations of States sponsoring persons and entities with respect to activities in the International Seabed Area (see Orders of 18 May and 28 July 2010). Dans un premier temps, l’affaire avait été dénommée Responsabilités et obligations des Etats qui patronnent des personnes et des entités dans le cadre d'activités menées dans la Zone internationale des fonds marins (voir les ordonnances du 18 mai et du 28 juillet 2010). | |
18 | The M/V "Louisa" Case (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Kingdom of Spain) |
M/V "Louisa" (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Kingdom of Spain), Order of 30 November 2010, ITLOS Reports 2008-2010, p. 52 | |
M/V "Louisa" (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Kingdom of Spain), Provisional Measures, Order of 23 December 2010, ITLOS Reports 2008-2010, p. 58 | |
M/V "Louisa" (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Kingdom of Spain), Order of 12 January 2011, ITLOS Reports 2011, p. 83 | |
M/V "Louisa" (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Kingdom of Spain), Order of 28 April 2011, ITLOS Reports 2011, p. 89 | |
M/V "Louisa" (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Kingdom of Spain), Order of 30 September 2011, ITLOS Reports 2011, p. 95 | |
M/V "Louisa" (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Kingdom of Spain), Order of 4 November 2011, ITLOS Reports 2011, p. 102 | |
M/V "Louisa" (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Kingdom of Spain), Order of 4 July 2012, ITLOS Reports 2012, p. 297 | |
M/V "Louisa" (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Kingdom of Spain), Judgment, ITLOS Reports 2013, p. 4 | |
19 | The M/V “Virginia G” Case (Panama/Guinea-Bissau) |
M/V “Virginia G” (Panama/Guinea-Bissau), Order of 18 August 2011, ITLOS Reports 2011, p. 109 | |
M/V “Virginia G” (Panama/Guinea-Bissau), Order of 30 September 2011, ITLOS Reports 2011, p. 116 | |
M/V “Virginia G” (Panama/Guinea-Bissau), Order of 23 December 2011, ITLOS Reports 2011, p. 123 | |
M/V “Virginia G” (Panama/Guinea-Bissau), Order of 8 August 2012, ITLOS Reports 2012, p. 303 | |
M/V “Virginia G” (Panama/Guinea-Bissau), Order of 2 November 2012, ITLOS Reports 2012, p. 309 | |
M/V “Virginia G” (Panama/Guinea-Bissau), Order of 24 April 2013, ITLOS Reports 2013, p. 196 | |
M/V “Virginia G” (Panama/Guinea-Bissau), Judgment, ITLOS Reports 2014, p. 4 | |
20 | The “ARA Libertad” Case (Argentina v. Ghana), Provisional Measures |
“ARA Libertad” (Argentina v. Ghana), Order of 20 November 2012, ITLOS Reports 2012, p. 326 | |
“ARA Libertad” (Argentina v. Ghana), Provisional Measures, Order of 15 December 2012, ITLOS Reports 2012, p. 332 | |
21 | Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission (SRFC) (Request for Advisory Opinion submitted to the Tribunal) |
Request for Advisory Opinion submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission, Order of 24 May 2013, ITLOS Reports 2013, p. 202 | |
Request for Advisory Opinion submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission, Order of 3 December 2013, ITLOS Reports 2013, p. 212 | |
Request for Advisory Opinion submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission, Order of 20 December 2013, ITLOS Reports 2013, p. 218 | |
Request for Advisory Opinion submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission, Order of 14 April 2014, ITLOS Reports 2014, p. 404 | |
Request for Advisory Opinion submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission, Advisory Opinion, 2 April 2015, ITLOS Reports 2015, p. 4 | |
22 | The “Arctic Sunrise” Case (Kingdom of the Netherlands v. Russian Federation), Provisional Measures |
“Arctic Sunrise” (Kingdom of the Netherlands v. Russian Federation), Order of 25 October 2013, ITLOS Reports 2013, p. 224 | |
“Arctic Sunrise” (Kingdom of the Netherlands v. Russian Federation), Provisional Measures, Order of 22 November 2013, ITLOS Reports 2013, p. 230 | |
23 | Dispute concerning delimitation of the maritime boundary between Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d’Ivoire) |
Delimitation of the maritime boundary in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d’Ivoire), Order of 12 January 2015, ITLOS Reports 2015, p. 122 | |
Delimitation of the maritime boundary in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d’Ivoire), Order of 24 February 2015, ITLOS Reports 2015, p. 134 | |
Delimitation of the maritime boundary in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d’Ivoire), Order of 6 March 2015, ITLOS Reports 2015, p. 140 | |
Delimitation of the maritime boundary in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d’Ivoire), Provisional Measures, Order of 25 April 2015, ITLOS Reports 2015, p. 146 | |
Delimitation of the maritime boundary in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d’Ivoire), Order of 16 March 2016, ITLOS Reports 2016, p. 4 | |
Delimitation of the maritime boundary in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d’Ivoire), Order of 25 April 2016, ITLOS Reports 2016, p. 11 | |
Delimitation of the maritime boundary in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d’Ivoire), Order of 15 December 2016, ITLOS Reports 2016, p. 18 | |
Delimitation of the maritime boundary in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d’Ivoire), Judgment, ITLOS Reports 2017, p. 4 | |
24 | The “Enrica Lexie” Incident (Italy v. India), Provisional Measures |
“Enrica Lexie” (Italy v. India), Provisional Measures, Order of 24 July 2015, ITLOS Reports 2015, p. 176 | |
“Enrica Lexie” (Italy v. India), Provisional Measures, Order of 24 August 2015, ITLOS Reports 2015, p. 182 | |
25 | The M/V “Norstar” Case (Panama v. Italy) |
M/V “Norstar” (Panama v. Italy), Order of 3 February 2016, ITLOS Reports 2016, p. 24 | |
M/V “Norstar” (Panama v. Italy), Preliminary Objections, Order of 15 March 2016, ITLOS Reports 2016, p. 31 | |
M/V “Norstar” (Panama v. Italy), Preliminary Objections, Order of 4 August 2016, ITLOS Reports 2016, p. 38 | |
M/V “Norstar” (Panama v. Italy), Preliminary Objections, Judgment, ITLOS Reports 2016, p. 44 | |
M/V “Norstar” (Panama v. Italy), Order of 29 November 2016, ITLOS Reports 2016, p. 240 | |
M/V “Norstar” (Panama v. Italy), Order of 15 November 2017, ITLOS Reports 2017, p. 193 | |
M/V “Norstar” (Panama v. Italy), Order of 20 July 2018, ITLOS Reports 2018-2019, p. 4 | |
M/V “Norstar” (Panama v. Italy), Judgment, ITLOS Reports 2018-2019, p.10 | |
26 | Case concerning the detention of three Ukrainian naval vessels (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Provisional Measures |
Detention of three Ukrainian naval vessels (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Provisional Measures, Order of 23 April 2019, ITLOS Reports 2018-2019, p. 271 | |
Detention of three Ukrainian naval vessels (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Provisional Measures, Order of 2 May 2019, ITLOS Reports 2018-2019, p. 277 | |
Detention of three Ukrainian naval vessels (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Provisional Measures, Order of 25 May 2019, ITLOS Reports 2018-2019, p. 283 | |
27 | The M/T “San Padre Pio” Case (Switzerland v. Nigeria), Provisional Measures |
M/T “San Padre Pio” (Switzerland v. Nigeria), Provisional Measures, Order of 29 May 2019, ITLOS Reports 2018-2019, p. 369 | |
M/T “San Padre Pio” (Switzerland v. Nigeria), Provisional Measures, Order of 6 July 2019, ITLOS Reports 2018-2019, p. 375 | |
28 | Dispute concerning delimitation of the maritime boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean (Mauritius/Maldives) |
Delimitation of the maritime boundary in the Indian Ocean (Mauritius/Maldives), Order of 27 September 2019, ITLOS Reports 2018-2019, p. 511 | |
Delimitation of the maritime boundary in the Indian Ocean (Mauritius/Maldives), Order of 10 October 2019, ITLOS Reports 2018-2019, p. 522 | |
Delimitation of the maritime boundary in the Indian Ocean (Mauritius/Maldives), Preliminary Objections, Order of 19 December 2019, ITLOS Reports 2018-2019, p. 528 | |
Delimitation of the maritime boundary in the Indian Ocean (Mauritius/Maldives), Preliminary Objections, Order of 19 May 2020, ITLOS Reports 2020-2021, p. 4 | |
Delimitation of the maritime boundary in the Indian Ocean (Mauritius/Maldives), Preliminary Objections, Order of 15 September 2020, ITLOS Reports 2020-2021, p. 11 | |
Delimitation of the maritime boundary in the Indian Ocean (Mauritius/Maldives), Preliminary Objections, Judgment, ITLOS Reports 2020-2021, p. 17 | |
Delimitation of the maritime boundary in the Indian Ocean (Mauritius/Maldives), Order of 3 February 2021, ITLOS Reports 2020-2021, p. 141 | |
Delimitation of the maritime boundary in the Indian Ocean (Mauritius/Maldives), Order of 15 December 2021, ITLOS Reports 2020-2021, p. 148 | |
Delimitation of the maritime boundary in the Indian Ocean (Mauritius/Maldives), Order of 18 August 2022, ITLOS Reports 2022, to be published | |
29 | The M/T ”San Padre Pio” (No. 2) Case (Switzerland/Nigeria) |
M/T “San Padre Pio” (No. 2) (Switzerland/Nigeria), Order of 7 January 2020, ITLOS Reports 2020-2021, p. 155 | |
M/T “San Padre Pio” (No. 2) (Switzerland/Nigeria), Order of 5 January 2021, ITLOS Reports 2021-2021, p. 165 | |
M/T “San Padre Pio” (No. 2) (Switzerland/Nigeria), Order of 18 June 2021, ITLOS Reports 2020-2021, p. 171 | |
M/T “San Padre Pio” (No. 2) (Switzerland/Nigeria), Order of 10 August 2021, ITLOS Reports 2020-2021, p. 177 | |
M/T “San Padre Pio” (No. 2) (Switzerland/Nigeria), Order of 29 December 2021, ITLOS Reports 2020-2021, p. 184 | |
30 | The M/T “Heroic Idun” Case (Marshall Islands v. Equatorial Guinea), Prompt Release Affaire du navire « Heroic Idun » (Îles Marshall c. Guinée équatoriale), prompte mainlevée |
M/T “Heroic Idun” (Marshall Islands v. Equatorial Guinea), Order of 11 November 2022, ITLOS Reports 2022-2023, to be published | |
M/T “Heroic Idun” (Marshall Islands v. Equatorial Guinea), Order of 15 November 2022, ITLOS Reports 2022-2023, to be published | |
31 | Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law (Request for Advisory Opinion submitted to the Tribunal) Demande d'avis consultatif soumise par la Commission des petits États insulaires sur le changement climatique et le droit international (Demande d'avis consultatif soumise au Tribunal) |
Request for Advisory Opinion submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law, Order of 16 December 2022, ITLOS Reports 2022-2023, to be published | |
Request for Advisory Opinion submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law, Order of 15 February 2023, ITLOS Reports 2022-2023, to be published | |
|
For declarations and separate and dissenting opinions, please see the following example: M/V “Louisa” (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Kingdom of Spain), Provisional Measures, Separate Opinion of Judge Paik, ITLOS Reports 2008-2010, p. 72
Pour les déclarations et les opinions individuelles et dissidentes, voir l’exemple suivant : Navire « Louisa » (Saint-Vincent-et-les Grenadines c. Royaume d’Espagne), mesures conservatoires, opinion individuelle de M. Paik, juge, TIDM Recueil 2008-2010, p. 72